Skip to main content

Are PC Makers really competing?





I have been looking to buy a laptop from the past 2 weeks. I am planning on using it as my daily driver. Here are the essentials that I am looking for.


Essential 
11-13 inch laptop around 2.75-3.5 pounds with ivy bridge i5
High screen resolution greater than 1366 * 768 (Can live with 1440 * 900 or preferred1600 * 900 or higher)
256 GB SSD


Bonus
i7 ivy bridge
8 GB RAM
Good battery life


So I went to HP, Dell, Toshiba, Lenovo, Asus, Acer, Samsung and did a Google product search for best prices over the net to see if I can get what I am looking for.


Here is the comparison.
(You can see the original size by clicking view Original size)










When I looked at the chart, I wondered if the PC Makers are really trying hard to compete against Apple in the segment that I am looking for. Granted, I have some basic essentials that a laptop must meet and for most folks this is not an issue. But the problem is most known vendors are ignoring the basic idea of providing options to users to customize their laptop. I have been using Lenovo T61 for almost 5 years now and even that laptop had a 1440 * 900 screen resolution. I am use to this resolution and for me that is the bare essential I am looking for in my next laptop. Most manufacturers have locked down the screen resolution (720p) and the RAM (4GB) size on their offerings. I personally don't like the 16:9 resolution (1366 * 768) and how it looks on a screen. I rather prefer 16 * 10 or higher on the laptops.


The only two player trying to compete against Apple are Samsung and Asus. Asus is the real dark horse here. I have to give them credit for providing a great alternative to MBA (Macbook Air) in the form of Asus UX31 and Asus UX21 (which is not yet officially out). 


Samsung with it's 15 inch has created a monster. I absolutely love their design, although the design aesthetics looks a lot like MBA, but the battery life, the screen and the weight around 3.5 inch is a real steal here.


As far as MBA is concerned, it's still the top dog when it comes to the ultrabooks category. The specs on MBA are just too good to ignore. You can reduce 200$ and go with the i5 and 4 GB RAM and yet it's a better machine compared to other ultra-books.


Now that brings me to the all important point - What if Apple comes out with a Macbook pro 13 with Retina display for 1799 with a 128 MB SSD and an option to go 256 SSD with dedicated graphics with a weight out 3.2 lbs? That will be huge and it will almost be a no-brainer and that point. I am sure, PC makers will reduce the prices on the existing model and then compete, which will be beneficial to the consumers. 


 As far as I am concerned - I am waiting for UX21 pricing and availability and might wait for MBA 13 MBP retina.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

To Clean Energy or not?

India is a nation of almost 1.2 billion people. There is an immense need for resources and infrastructure to sustain the growing population and the booming Indian economy to keep the nation moving forward. India also lacks the basic infrastructure at rural areas to provide the basic necessity like power, roads and water supply. It's common in B-town city to have a structured way of "power-cuts" ranging anywhere from 2 hrs. - 8 hrs. a day in summer! For the longest period of time, India has been dependent on Coal, and its power is more or less generated by Coal energy or fossil fuels. Coal as everyone knows is one of the "old" energy technology responsible for carbon emission and India has always walked a tight line, when it comes to Kyoto Protocol aimed at fighting global warming. India is at a threshold to usher in Nuclear energy with a new proposed nuclear power plant in Jaitapur, Maharashtra. The proposed nuclear power plant is no ordinary plant -- The 5 b

Interesting Articles - May 2nd 2017

1. All eyes on iPhone Sales - iPhone 8 (4 mins) I love reading Bob Lefetz newsletter. He has his own unique way of saying the things that he wants to say where a layman can understand it. " Tech is all about utility, not fashion. And there’s no breakthrough coming, other than a curved screen. You needed a new phone when they went from 3G to LTE. You needed a new phone when they increased the screen size. You no longer need a new phone, especially since the carriers have stopped subsidizing the purchase, now that the true cost is evident. People drive their cars ever-longer, but analysts believe consumers are all gonna fork over a thousand bucks for a fashion statement? Not gonna happen. Otherwise, 3-D TV would have been a juggernaut and you’d be throwing away your present flat screen for one with 4k." http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/2017/05/01/iphone-8/ Bonus article  - Bob had an amazing post last week just before Twitter's quarterly results

Is it the rebirth of Nokia?

Is it the rebirth of Nokia?  The two products that were announced, definitely stands out from the hardware point of view, but is the normal die-hard audience ready for a non-symbian/Meego OS from Espoo? Is Windows 7 that compelling, that consumers will forgo an iOS device with equally great ecosystem or for that matter the amazing choices of hardware that one gets from different manufacturer on Android? I was  disappointed with the device on two fronts. No front facing camera and  absolutely no guidance on US release. I was hoping that from the time Nokia made the decision to move from Symbian to Windows Phone 7 in February, they couldn't leverage the partnership to bake Skype to provide an awesome alternative to cell plans..at least in Europe.  Front facing video calls with Skype and Windows Phone 7 OS could have had a good selling point. Also w ith the direction of XBOX integration in windows phone 7, 512 MB just doesn't cut it anymore. I understand, iPhone 4S has the